Spectral Tv Stands

Author MPKing BSc. (Hons)

The generally accepted cosmological theories

It has been theorized by many scientists that the Big Bang occurred about 12,000 million years and that the cosmos until that time did not exist. Now, I find it very difficult to accept that an event like the Big Bang - with these large amounts of energy to be well beyond our understanding - comes out of nowhere and has continued to train the known cosmos today. It is also indicated by the scientific question that is insufficient in the cosmos today tied with the calculated amounts, the amount would be decided one way or another if the cosmos distant future of First, continue to develop, on the other hand, will remain at a maximum final without expansion or finally reach a maximum before returning to a state contractor. The uniqueness comes from the first telescope Hubble has now repaired a magnification easily able to clearly see the outskirts of the big bang expansion. There is no outer fringe to the cosmos at 12,000 million light years away. Clearly something is wrong with the theory is or calculations. I also think that fringe 12,000 million light years would require an expansion of 12,000 million light years, then the return of the light emitted at the fringe, which would then take another 12,000 million light years from us reach a total of 24 million light years, which means that after 12,000 million light years, we would see the fringe of 6,000 million light years, Hubble equation uses a constant so that results should be generated, but if a constant is necessary, the theory is suspect, but perhaps we should not go. The second anomaly is the theory presented to allow the missing matter. The missing matter by scientists today is composed of dark matter which we can not see and whose effects can not be measured, practical if nothing else. The third anomaly is involved in the galaxies, each of which is said to be falling into a black hole. Would it not conceivable for each galaxy after an individual or large bang and put a white hole? Certainly, the effect of spiral galaxies would then be due to individual matter falling into black holes very great distance in the future especially if the Sun approach the question of black hole is at an angle to the axis. He was also recently reported the cosmos is expanding, but at an accelerating pace.

To accelerate the cosmological expansion to occur, huge amounts of energy beyond the imagination would be necessary, at a time - another joke theory. The last theory I must admit, it is quite plausible, is that over a sufficiently long period of aging cosmos, the sun burns and every body will decompose and eventually turn to dust, no natural light everything. This is the case of cosmological time functions as accepted.

Personally, I do not think this should be the way of things to come. Others may disagree with me, but until I see evidence to support any other theories about how "I will continue to choose to understand how cosmic as follows:

The Big Bang occurred, but so many others spread throughout the cosmos at different times and places, of untold millions of them. This accounts for the lack fringe expansion to 12,000 million light years away, because the mixture of many extensions would be considered a continuous cosmos. The rate of expansion of the universe occur at different places and in different directions would be at an adequate distance, seemed to accelerate in reference to our own position, with particular emphasis on the possibility of the position of the observation.